The Radeon Pro 5300M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 85 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
63
76%
Min 1% FPS
31
70%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$477.84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.75/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
40 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
100 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
3.2 TFLOPS
59%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 100 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 3.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
