Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon Pro 460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2391 days newer than Radeon Pro 460.
Advantages of Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 35 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 157% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro 460 - 131 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro 460 - 16 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$749.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Oct 30th, 2016
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Oct 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
17%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro 460 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
850 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
907 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1270 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |