The Radeon 780M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
58%
Min 1% FPS
28
49%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, CA$
CA$399.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.96/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$399.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$5,920.36
In Stock
Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
83%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 780M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 86.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.7 GPixel/s |
| 129.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 233.3 GTexel/s |
8.294 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.465 TFLOPS |
