Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3090 is 854 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Performs up to 2900% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon 680M - 90 vs 3 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 50 vs 350 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce RTX 3090
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 3090
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
37.09167544783983%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
18.992805755395683%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | vs | AMD Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 30 | Generation | Navi II IGP |
| $1499 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| 1x 12-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
| 24 GB | Memory | System-Shared |
| GDDR6X | Type | System-Shared |
| 384-bit | Bus | System-Shared |
| 936.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
| 1395 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
| 1695 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2200 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | System-Shared |
