Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 788 days newer than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 25 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than GeForce MX450 25W - 215 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 8 vs 2 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$427.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$427.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
11%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
9%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |