Key Differences
In short — GeForce MX450 25W outperforms Radeon R7 250X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce MX450 25W is 2375 days newer than Radeon R7 250X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon R7 250X - 27 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 25 vs 80 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 2 vs 1 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $99 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 950 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |