Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 1058 days newer than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 20 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 49% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce MX350 - 493 vs 331 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 16 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1335 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
| 1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
