Key Differences
In short — GeForce MX350 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce MX350 is 2316 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250 - 59 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 20 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
