Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 308 days newer than GeForce GTX 760.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 170 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 23% better in Valheim than GeForce GTX 760 - 70 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 - 4 vs 2 GB
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GTX 760
Desktop • Jun 25th, 2013
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 760
Desktop • Jun 25th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
24.77 GPixel/s
38%
Texel Fillrate
99.07 GTexel/s
55%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $249 | MSRP | $1499 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
