Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 555 days newer than GeForce GTX 750.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 55 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 1400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 750 - 15 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 750
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 750
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
34.72 GTexel/s
13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$119 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1020 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1085 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
