Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 726 days newer than GeForce GTX 690.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 300 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 21% better in Valheim than GeForce GTX 690 - 70 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 - 4 vs 2 GB
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 3rd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
32.61 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
130.4 GTexel/s
72%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
May 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$999 | MSRP | $1499 |
3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
915 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1019 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |