Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GTX 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 619 days newer than GeForce GTX 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 100 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 4% better in Diablo IV than GeForce GTX 680M - 57 vs 55 FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |