Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 660M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1253 days newer than GeForce GTX 660M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 20% better in Valorant than GeForce GTX 660M - 598 vs 497 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M - 4 vs 1 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
835 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |