Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3422 days newer than GeForce GTX 660.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 16% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than GeForce GTX 660 - 79 vs 68 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 50 vs 140 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 4 vs 2 GB
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
79
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$409.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
73%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$229 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |