Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 511 days newer than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 110 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 11% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GTX 650 Ti - 151 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti - 3 vs 1 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
14.85 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
59.39 GTexel/s
56%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 9th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $279 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
928 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
