Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GTX 460M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1259 days newer than GeForce GTX 460M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 460M - 39 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 2 vs 1.5 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 460M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1.5 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
