Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 479 days older than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 21% better in F1 22 than Radeon Pro 5600M - 99 vs 82 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$736.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$736.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
92%
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
86%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 15th, 2020 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Mac |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
192-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 822 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1144 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 770 MHz |