Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1335 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon R9 Nano - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 6 vs 4 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 192-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
