Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 902 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Arc A310 - 53 vs 50 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 30 vs 50 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
50
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$143.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$143.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |