Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 3838 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 52% better in Elden Ring than GeForce 210 - 50 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 31 vs 50 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
33
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$91.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$91.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |