Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2365 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 50 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 61 vs 57 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 290X
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
55%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
