Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 790 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 92 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 6 vs 4 GB
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$176.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$176.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |