Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2357 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 171% better in Remnant II than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 19 vs 7 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 30 vs 50 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
7
36%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$19.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |