Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 1703 days older than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 13 vs 10 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 50 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
10
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$134.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |