Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3772 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTS 250 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$220.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
95%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |