Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GT 640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 693 days newer than GeForce GT 640M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 32 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 640M - 39 vs 33 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |