Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 658 days newer than GeForce GT 630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 65 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than GeForce GT 630 - 143 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 3 vs 1 GB
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 630
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 630
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
3.24 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
12.96 GTexel/s
12%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
