Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6600M outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6600M is 4213 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6600M - 69 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Performs up to 37% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GT 240 - 78 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 8 vs 1 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon RX 6600M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
2.8460543337645543%
Texel Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
6.5040650406504055%
Radeon RX 6600M
Mobile • May 31st, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | May 31st, 2021 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi Mobile |
| $80 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2068 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2416 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
