Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 220 outperforms GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 442 days older than GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than GeForce GT 520 - 44 vs 43 FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 29 vs 58 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
33.75%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
45%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 500 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $59 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
