Key Differences
In short — GeForce 210 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce 210 is 106 days older than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than GeForce GT 220 - 188 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 31 vs 58 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
43.333333333333336%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
28.888888888888893%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |