Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4642 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 5400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 220 - 55 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$288.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$288.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
1.7857142857142856%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
2.6785714285714284%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |