Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 2757 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 58 vs 210 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 89% better in Battlefield V than GeForce GT 220 - 142 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$664.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$664.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
5.098789037603569%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
4.3702579666160855%
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 14th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Vega |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1156 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1471 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 800 MHz |