Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250 is 1351 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than GeForce GT 220 - 22 vs 21 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
32.43243243243243%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
48.648648648648646%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
