Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce 930M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2504 days newer than GeForce 930M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 33 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce 930M - 88 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 930M - 4 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
88
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$344.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$344.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 930M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
928 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
941 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |