Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce 920MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 696 days older than GeForce 920MX.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 16 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 59% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce 920MX - 54 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce 920MX
Mobile • Mar 25th, 2016
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 965 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 993 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
