The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the same performance gaming GPU as the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The GeForce 210 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 31 vs 45 Watts
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
40
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, CA$
CA$216.69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.41/FPS
100%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
HD Graphics | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |