Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A380 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A380. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A380
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The GPU's performance with selected game settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44
61%
Min 1% FPS
15
43%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A380 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A380 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
18%
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
