Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms UHD Graphics 615 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1709 days older than UHD Graphics 615.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than UHD Graphics 615 - 338 vs 322 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
UHD Graphics 615
Integrated • Nov 7th, 2018
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 615
Integrated • Nov 7th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
2.7 GPixel/s
9%
Texel Fillrate
21.6 GTexel/s
20%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 615 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 7th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
