Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms UHD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1708 days older than UHD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 22% better in Escape From Tarkov than UHD Graphics 610 - 133 vs 109 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
2.1 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
12.6 GTexel/s
4%
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
