Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms UHD Graphics 600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 837 days older than UHD Graphics 600.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 5 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than UHD Graphics 600 - 104 vs 82 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
1.3 GPixel/s
2.03125%
Texel Fillrate
7.8 GTexel/s
3.046875%
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Dec 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
