Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 498 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 800% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU - 9 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
9
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$20/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
22 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
47%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |