Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250E outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250E is 200 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 45 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 503 vs 497 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
55%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
