Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1491 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 91 vs 84 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
6.3 GPixel/s
21.098459477561956%
Texel Fillrate
50.4 GTexel/s
48.229665071770334%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
