Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 854 days older than HD Graphics 620.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 18% better in World of Warcraft than HD Graphics 620 - 151 vs 128 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
HD Graphics 620
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
