Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 262 days older than HD Graphics 5500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than HD Graphics 5500 - 106 vs 99 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
HD Graphics 5500
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 5500
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.55 GPixel/s
15%
Texel Fillrate
20.4 GTexel/s
42%
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
