Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms HD Graphics 510 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 364 days older than HD Graphics 510.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 286% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HD Graphics 510 - 27 vs 7 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
HD Graphics 510
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 510
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
6.466984343090537%
Texel Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
11.089494163424126%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 510 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
