Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms HD Graphics 510 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 516 days older than HD Graphics 510.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 15 vs 19 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 986% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HD Graphics 510 - 76 vs 7 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
HD Graphics 510
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 510
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
43.859649122807014%
Intel HD Graphics 510 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
