Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Arc A380 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 935 days older than Arc A380.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 75 vs 100 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Arc A380 - 30 vs 28 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Arc A380
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Arc A380
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
95.07246376811594%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
84.14634146341464%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
| 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
