Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 1079 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 59% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - CA$143.03 vs CA$349.99
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 30 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 267% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Arc A310 - 22 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Arc A310 - CA$15.91 vs CA$23.84 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 6 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$143.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
22
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$15.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.99
40%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |