Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 1055 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 30 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Arc A310 - 104 vs 95 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
50.724637681159415%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
40.57971014492754%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
| 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
